Monday, March 12, 2012

The Mayor of Casterbridge

The Mayor of Casterbridge

About the author
Thomas Hardy was born in 1840 in Dorset, a rural county
in the south-west of England. His father was a stonemason
and the family were not well off. Hardy showed an early
interest in books, however, and when he was sixteen, he
began training as an architect in Dorchester. In 1862, he
went to work in London, where he was able to compare
city life with the customs and timeless ways of the country
village where he grew up. He began writing in his spare
time. In 1870, he met and fell in love with Emma Gifford,
but they could not afford to marry. His fourth novel, Far
From the Madding Crowd, published in 1874, was a big
success. This allowed him to become a full-time writer and
to marry. Hardy wrote several more novels, among them
The Mayor of Casterbridge, published in 1886. He and
Emma lived in Dorset, but they spent part of every year in
London, where they mixed with literary people and Hardy
was much admired. Although Hardy’s books were very
popular, when Jude the Obscure appeared in 1896, people
hated it. They thought it was an attack on marriage, and
found it shocking and immoral. Hardy turned to poetry
and never wrote another novel. He died in 1928. Some
biographers portray him as snobbish, mean and hateful
towards women. Others believe he was a sensitive man
who cared deeply about the human condition.
Summary
Young, poor Michael Henchard feels trapped by his wife
and child and one night gets drunk at a fair and sells
them to a stranger called Newson. Horrified by what
he has done, he swears not to touch alcohol for twenty one
years. Eighteen years later he is the mayor of Casterbridge
and a successful businessman. Believing Newson is dead,
his wife, Susan, and daughter, Elizabeth-Jane, arrive in
Casterbridge to find Henchard because she has no money.
He marries her again and they have a short happy life
together. Farfrae, a young man with modern business
ideas, arrives at the same time and becomes Henchard’s
farm manager. Susan dies, and Henchard learns that
Elizabeth-Jane is really Newson’s daughter. Henchard falls
out with Farfrae, who sets up a rival business, and soon
outdoes him. A woman from Henchard’s past, Lucetta,
comes to Casterbridge. Henchard now wants to marry
her, but she and Farfrae fall in love. Henchard’s business
fails and he loses his house so he starts drinking again.
Lucetta dies of shock after the local people make fun of
her and Henchard in public. He sees that he will now
lose his ‘daughter’ as well as everything else. He leaves
Casterbridge on foot. He is penniless and has lost his
family – just as at the beginning of the story. Elizabeth-
Jane remains loyal to Henchard, but he dies before she can
find him.
Chapter 1: Henchard, a farm worker aged twenty, has a
family, no job and no home. He gets drunk and sells his
wife and child for five guineas to a sailor named Newson
at a fair. Devastated at what he has done, he looks for
them without success. Henchard makes a solemn promise
not to touch alcohol for twenty years.
Chapter 2: Susan, widowed and poor, and her eighteenyear-
old daughter, Elizabeth-Jane arrive in Casterbridge to
find Henchard. She is relieved to find he is now the Mayor
and a businessman who needs a corn manager for his
growing business.
Chapter 3: Henchard employs Farfrae, a handsome
innovative Scotsman as corn manager and the business
improves. He also meets Susan and devises a plan so
that the townspeople do not find their marriage strange.
He draws closer to Farfrae and tells him about his past;
including a woman in Jersey he promised to marry.
Chapter 4: Henchard marries Susan, but she is reluctant
to have her daughter’s last name changed. He and Farfrae
disagree publicly over a worker. Henchard is jealous and
organises a rival entertainment day to Farfrae’s, but it fails.
Farfrae leaves him and sets up a rival business. Susan dies
but leaves a letter with the truth about her daughter.
Chapter 5: Henchard tells Elizabeth-Jane what happened
at the fair twenty years ago but reads in Susan’s letter that
she is really Newson’s daughter. He begins to treat her
coldly, and even encourages Farfrae to see her. Elizabeth-
Jane meets a woman at her mother’s grave who is friendly
and offers her to share her house.

Chapter 6: Lucetta, the woman from Jersey, has inherited
property in Casterbridge and has employed Elizabeth-Jane
as a housekeeper. Henchard tries to see her but they fail to
meet. Farfrae calls in to see Elizabeth-Jane, who is out. He
likes Lucetta and she loses interest in Henchard.
Chapter 7: Henchard goes bankrupt because of the
weather and his own impatience while Farfrae’s business
succeeds. Henchard realises he and Farfrae compete for
Lucetta’s love, so he threatens her with making their past
public so that she accepts his proposal of marriage.
Chapter 8: Henchard agrees to postpone their wedding
if Lucetta helps him buy some time to repay a debt to
Grower. She can’t because she has secretly married Farfrae
and Grower acted as witness.
Chapter 9: Henchard claims the letters from his safe, and
reads them out to Farfrae without disclosing the sender.
He promises Lucetta to give tham back to her and asks
Jopp to deliver them.
Chapter 10: Jopp asks Lucetta to help him become her
husband’s manager but she refuses. In a pub, he reads out
the letters to two women and they plan a skimmity-ride in
town to scorn Lucetta and Henchard.
Chapter 11: A member of the Royal family visits the
town but Henchard is not allowed to greet him. Hurt,
Henchard fights Farfrae in a barn but cannot bring himself
to kill him.
Chapter 12: Henchard is back in town to see the ride.
Farfrae does not see the ride because he is lured away from
town but Lucetta dies of the shock.
Chapter 13: Henchard and Elizabeth-Jane live
together happily. Elizabeth-Jane and Farfrae renew their
relationship and get married. Newson returns and tells his
daughter the truth, which makes her very happy.
Henchard leaves the town.
Chapter 14: Elizabeth-Jane marries Farfrae and tries to
find her father to take care of him but he dies before she
can find him.
The original text
The novel first appeared serially, in twenty instalments,
in 1886 in The Graphic, an English periodical and
simultaneously in the United States. The book appeared
as soon as the serial publication was complete but it differs
a lot from the serial novel. It has been adapted for TV as a
miniseries.
Background and themes
Where the story came from: Hardy claims the story
was inspired by three actual events: the sale of a wife
by her husband reported in a local newspaper, the
uncertain harvests and the visit of Prince Albert, Queen
Victoria’s husband, to Dorchester, the town upon which
Casterbridge is based, in 1849.
Fight with self: The main theme of the book is
Henchard’s fight against two things: his own character
and chance. As he fights with himself, his actions and
decisions affect other people’s lives, usually badly. He
often allows negative feelings to overwhelm him – at the
beginning when things seem so bad he sells his wife. He is
always honest in business, but not always kind; he is often
impatient and quick to anger, but he is capable of great
love and great loneliness. His complex character creates
uncertainty in the reader – should we feel sorry for him or
does he deserve everything that happens to him?
Chance: Chance plays an important part throughout the
story: the chance appearance of Newson in the tent when
Henchard is trying to sell his wife; the rain that spoils
Henchard’s fair; the August weather that ruins Henchard’s
business; the chance meeting between Farfrae and Lucetta
when they fall in love. Hardy believes that although
Henchard is a powerful character, he is never fully in
control of his life.
Alcohol also has a role here. Henchard’s life improves
when he stops drinking; as he devotes himself to work,
builds a successful business and eventually becomes mayor.
Once he starts again, he loses his pride and his judgement.
Traditional versus modern: The two men represent
contrasting ways of life in the country. Henchard is
traditional and old-fashioned. Farfrae is young and
modern. Hardy was always fascinated by country customs
and ways. He often includes strange country rituals like
the skimmity-ride in his novels. They make useful plot
devices and allow him to paint pictures of colourful but
less important characters. He also uses them to reveal the
conservative side of society, which can be very cruel to
people who fall outside its strict rules of moral behaviour.
Lucetta dies because of the skimmity joke. This breaking
of the moral code becomes a very important theme in
Hardy’s later novels, which shocked the reading public
and ended Hardy’s novel-writing career.

Monday, February 6, 2012

अभी पिछले दिनों मैं २-४ फ़रवरी सेंट्रल यूनिवर्सिटी, ब्राम्बे में था, एक International Conference का हिस्सा बन कर..टॉपिक थी: Text,Culture and Performance: Postcolonial Issues . इस इंटरनेशनल कोन्फेरेन्स में वयस्था वाकई इंटरनेशनल लेवल की थी (thanks to organiser Dr. B.P.Sinha), पर देश -विदेश से आये प्रतिभागियों ( कुछ एक को छोड़ कर) कि सोच बिलकुल लोकल... वही छेत्रवाद, बंगाली बंधु एक साथ , बिहारी एक साथ, झारखंडी एक साथ, नोर्थ-इस्ट एक साथ , दिल्ली से आये मद में इतराती टोली एक साथ ...विदेश से आये विदेशी एक साथ , फिर भी साथ-साथ कोई नहीं... Post-colonial जैसे मॉडर्न टॉपिक पे बहस करते हुए भी हम बहुत बैकवर्ड दिखे..
एक दूसरी चीज जो चुभने वाली थी , वह जेएनयू या फिर दिल्ली युनिवेर्सिटी वालों की बौडी लैंग्वेज थी..झूठे दंभ में सडांध मारती. उनके पपेर्स में उतना दम नहीं दिखा, जितना उन्होंने अपनी हेकड़ी में दिखाई. . फ़ाल्स अक्सेंट में सिर्फ अंग्रेजी बोल भर लेना काफी नहीं है..उनकी टोली मुझे टी एस  इलियट कि " hollowmen"  जैसी दिखी..अंदर से बिलकुल खोखला ..
दिल्ली में बैठ कर एक कुनबा बनाकर पूरे देश में अपने आप को विद्वान कि तरह परोसे जाने कि कवायद अच्छी है , पर इन कुनबों के मार्फ़त शिक्षा का व्यापारीकरण ठीक नहीं. मैं बगैर  IACLALS ( Indian assocition for Commonwealth Litearature and Language Studies)  की एक शीर्षस्थ पदाधिकारी का नाम लिए , इस संस्था की उस प्रयास की भ्रत्सना करता हूँ, जो छोटे जगहों से जुड़े लोगों की मासूमियत पर प्रहार करती है. इस कोन्फेरेन्स के दौरान IACLALS की एक पदाधिकारी ने कई एस्कोलार्स को पेपर पढ़ने से मन कर दिया , क्योंकि उन्होंने  IACLALS की सदयस्ता शुल्क नहीं दी थी , जबकि इस कोन्फेरेन्स का हिस्सा होने के लिए सेन्ट्रल युनिवेर्सिटी ने पहले से शुल्क ले रखा था. जब बात सेन्ट्रल युनिवेर्सिटी के पदाधिकारियों तक पहुंची, उन्होंने दिल्ली से पहुंची  IACLALS  टीम कि भरपूर भर्त्सना की . आप एक तरफ पोस्ट-कोलोनिअल जैसे टॉपिक पर चर्चा करते हैं और मानसिकता , वही जस की तस .आप महानगरों से आते हैं , जहाँ सपने बेचे जाते हैं , पर आप उन सतरंगी सपनो पे सवार होकर हम जैसे छोटे कस्बों में माँ सरस्वती कि सेवा में लगे लोगों कि आँखों में धुल न झोकें. इस से आपकी इमेज खराब होती है. उस से कष्टकर ये होता है कि अब हम किधर जाएँ? जिन्हें हमने अब तक अपने प्रतिमान मान रखा था , वो तो खोखला निकला.
एक और चौंकाने वाली बात ये थी कि विदेशों से आये हुए एक्सपर्ट भी attitude में बिलकुल लोकल ही निकले. वो चीजों को इतना पर्सनालाईज़ और सुब्जेक्टिव नजरिये से देख रहे थे कि मुझे ताजूब हो रहा था कि कहीं हम, अभी भी उनकी बसाई गयी " कोलोनी " का हिस्सा तो नहीं. जब मैंने स्टोक्ली करमैकेल को कोट किया "
The West with its guns and its power and its might came into Africa, Asia, Latin America and the USA and raped it. And while they raped it they used beautiful terms. They told the Indians ‘we’re civilizing you, and we’re taming the West. And if you won’t be civilized, we’ll kill you.’ So, they committed genocide and stole the land, and put the Indians on reservations, and they said that they had civilized the country.
मेरे session  के चेअरमन Mr. Paul Sharrad ( University of Wollongong, Australia) की भौएँ चढ़ते मैंने देखीं . मेरा पेपर कल्चरल पाइरेसी पर था. उन्होंने इसे पर्सनालायिज़ कर लिया. मेरे पेपर के बाद मुझसे बहस भी हुई. ये एक अच्छी पहल थी. पर बुरा ये लगा कि जब वे बाहर लंच में मिले, मेरे दो- चार बार टोकने के बावजूद भी मेरी तरफ देखा तक नहीं. चोट गहरी लगी थी. हमारे २५० सालों कि गुलामी से भी ज्यादा चोटिल वो दिख रहे थे. पर मि. पौल , मैं आपके खिलाफ नहीं था. मैं तो उस दर्द का हमदर्द था जो भारत जैसे मुल्क में रहने वालों ने लोगों ने सहा है. भारत कि अपनी तहजीब रही है बाहर से आये हुए मेहमानों कि इज्ज़त-आफजाई में कोई भी कसर हम नहीं छोड़ते. मेरी  भी मकसद आपको ठेस पहुँचाने की नहीं थी, पर आप इतने तंगदिल निकलेंगे , सोचा न था.  
कुल मिला कर इस इंटरनेशनल कोन्फेरेन्स कि कंडीशन बिलकुल लोकल ही लग रही थी. मैं एक बहुत अच्छे निष्कर्ष पे पहुँच पाया - विद्वान चाहे कहीं का भी हो, चमड़ी चाहे गोरी हो या काली हो- सोच बिलकुल अपने तक ही  सिमटा रहता है. 
दूसरा  निष्कर्ष ये कि अगर यूजीसी प्रोमोशन के लिए ऐसे सेमिनार/ कोन्फेरेन्स की जरुरत को खत्म कर दे तो शायद इस कोन्फेरेन्स में जुटे "विशाल" १५० लोगों का जमावड़ा भी १०- १५ तक सिमट जाये.  
पर अंत में मैं अपने गुरुदेव डॉ. बी पी. सिन्हा जी को थैंक्स देना चाहता हूँ, जिन्होंने मैनेजमेंट का लेवल वर्ल्ड - क्लास रखा था और जिनकी टीम ने अपने होस्पितालिटी से सबका मन मोह रखा था, "दिल्ली वालों" का भी..

Sunday, August 14, 2011

I m reborn

In Dedication to my Guru: SRI SRI
I m reborn...
As you touched me
No .. I m not mimosa pudica
but
Alchemist are you
I was not knowing
But when
A new moon dawned on me
A new sun shone itself on my roof
when
Smile slipped slowly on the faces I see
When
Tears bid adieu
very silently to my dear ones
When
my shy legs started to tap in rhythm
when
I began to catch rains with open palms
When
Death became Shiva 
When life started to sing in my gully
I knew
I m new..:)

Friday, April 1, 2011

Pride n Prejudice : in Nut-Shell

Pride and Prejudice


Mr &; Mrs Bennet

( a woman of mean understanding, little information & uncertain temper).

5 daughters :

• Jane, the eldest, remarkably beautiful.

• Elizabeth: pretty, sensible, quick-witted( for Darcy- she was ‘ tolerable but not beautiful enough to tempt him’)

• Mary, fond of reading

• Catherine & Lydia- ( much pampered by Mrs. Bennet and supported their daughters’ run after army officers) spent most of their time in man- hunting, running after military officers.

+ Young Mr. Bingley ( good looking & gentleman-like) – the neighbour of Mr. & Mrs. Bennet and Sir William Lucas ( father of Charlotte,27,sensible, intelligent, young woman & intimate friend of Elizabeth)

+ Darcy( tall, attractive but proud), Bingley’s friend

+ Mr. Hurst – Bro-in-law of Mr. Bingley

- Ms Bingley & Mrs Hurst- Bingley’s two sisters.

After the Ball, * Jane & Elizabeth talked about Mr. Bingley & Darcy alongwith Charlotte and Darcy was unanimously condemned for his overweening pride.

*Mrs. Hurst & Ms Bingley ( sisters of Bingley) also appreciated Miss Bennet ( Jane &Elizabeth )

* Darcy’s opinion about Elizabeth also changed.. He spoke about the Elizabeth’s beautiful eyes to Miss Bingley, who was, however, displeased with the appreciation for she wanted that Darcy’s attention should be absorbed completely in her.

Jane’s Dinner with Miss Bingley : went on horseback, got wet through before she reached Netherfield – fell ill

Elizabeth started on foot for Netherfield, made good impression on Darcy.Miss Bingley , though, directly or indirectly pointed out Elizabeth’s defects to Darcy, Darcy steadily grew in his esteem. Later, Miss Bingley made herself ridiculous. Elizabeth’s behavior on the other hand,was natural & dignified. She was neither too reserved nor too familiar with the members of the Netherfield family. She knew when to talk & when to be silent, observations were apt & intelligent.

Soon , Mrs Bennet came to see Jane.

Jane health improved- Bingley was sincerely happy to see Jane well.

Elizabeth’s prejudice came against Darcy that, 1. He had ruined her sister Jane, prohibiting her chances to marry Mr. Bingley to whom she loved most.

2. She accuses him of ruining the chances of Wickham’s progress. ( Wickham, the officer- jealous of Mr. Darcy . Darcy, too, in return gave a hint that Wickham was not a good man, Lydia, finally eloped with Wickham in Burghton).

Elizabeth’s Visit to Darcy’s Residence Once in the absence of Mr. darcy, Elizabeth happened to visit his residence and quite contrary to her perception regarding him, she renewed all praises for him from his staff).

Mr. Collins, the cousin of Mr. Bennet, proposes Elizabeth for reasons:

1. To set an example of matrimony in his parish

2. Marriage would add to his happiness

3. It was advice & recommendation of his patroness lady Catherine de Borough

Lastly, Darcy married to Elzabeth,  Jane to Mr. Bingley.


UNDERTAKINGS ( CHARACTERSTICS ) OF BEING iNDIAN

After a dexterous cross-cultural study based upon  five novels, I propose some measure rules and conventions, peculiarities and traits that a person can be associated and identified with; if he or she claims himself or herself to be an Indian, which give him or her a separate identity even if sharing the common dance floor of “cultural allotropy”. I am deliberately writing these traits in the style of the court’s UNDERTAKINGS:

 That, “Indian prefer to marry only once in a life time.”92

If any Indian like Vasu of THE MAN-EATER OF MALGUDI believes that “only fools marry, and they deserve all the trouble they get,”93 we call them “anglicized Indian” or a “cultural allotrope with scientific outlook”.

 That, “Indians discuss things more than any other people.”94

(In support of the above argument, one should travel through the Malgudi Road and should rest at Natraj’s parlour in THE MAN –EATER OF MALGUDI, which is “a sort of cultural hub, a rendezvous, where people from different schools of thought and professions make gathering, chitchat, having a nice pastime and discuss on various topics viz. Nehru policy or Five plans for long hours of a day.”95)

 That “in India everything end (ed)s seeking money.”96 ( This “bribe-culture” of India has become more prominent after the sensational revelation by one of the most reputed business houses of India Ratan Tata group and the Wiki leaks disclosure of Indian black money with Swiss Banks )

 That, “to move up in India one needed good contacts.”97

 That, “when Indians sleep, they really do sleep… No regular bed – time … don’t stir again till the next day begin.”98

 That, “On a (an Indian) train everyone want(ed)s to know everyone else.”99

 That, “Indian take themselves ‘so seriously’.100

 That, “there are no lovers in Indian gardens. Only little heaps of humanity lay here and there.”101

 That, in India, even ‘scrap is useful’.102 (Indians have got habit of collecting and preserving things regardless of its utility which is much against the West’s ‘Use and Throw’ utilitarian society ).

 That, “in India ‘more people … have to die on the roads, if (the) nation is to develop any road sense at all.”103

 That, in India, people respect for “four-wheeler” community ‘or say’ automobile fraternity.”104

 That, a majority of us misinterpret the meaning of ‘a free country’ and ‘fundamental rights’.105

 That, Indians love the music of West, especially ‘Vivaldi’.106

 That, Indians are ‘emotional’107 and ‘sentimental’108

 That, everyone in India smokes.109 ( A recent WHO Report ,2010 also ditto it and states that India is Rank 1 holder in tobacco consumption )

 That, a ‘Cola-generation’ in India ‘doesn’t oil its hair’110 and likes “T-shirts and Colvin Klein jeans ... fast food joints, … motorcycles …, girlfriends (they) could lay anytime … marijuana, even a little cocaine, the singers who won the Grammy awards, … calling rupees bucks … ambition to go abroad (‘to the US of A’)111” and they like “girls in their arse-hugging jeans and T-Shirts with lewd one –liners.112

 That, Indians prefer not to ‘waste food’.113

 That, in India ‘one always argues with any taxi-scooter – or rickshaw-wala on principle’. Otherwise the journey is not complete.114

 That, in India, people love to be ‘English’ but do not forget to abuse English; sometimes as ‘the language of bloodsucking imperialists, they made our hearts weep ...”115

 That, now in India, the young generation loves to ‘wear a tie, use … credit card, kiss the wives of … colleagues on the cheek and smoke a joint, listen to Scott Joplin and Keith Jarret, and on weekends … see a Horror film, or a Carlos Saura…”116

 That, the crookedness of taxi and auto-rickhaw – drivers of all Indians cities (especially of the north) is ‘matchless, almost mythic.”117

 That, in India, “the men sit apart from the women and children ... may be because no one wants to see a man and a woman enjoying anything together.”118

 That, in India, knowing English language ‘gives one … confidence.”119

 That, India should be taken for granted as ‘a nation of saints’.120

 That, most of the elite and privileged Indians find themselves “so underdeveloped as compared to”121 the westerners.

Also, this research has found that most of the westerners come to India either ‘for a spiritual purpose’122 or ‘in the hope of finding a simpler and more natural way of life’123 but all they “find here is dysentery”.124

After passing through a subjugation of more than a couple of centuries, India today has got a whole lot of hexa-and septegenerians who are transfixed in the twilight zone of new changes. As a result, their condition has almost become that of an ‘allotropic’ (that is full of paradoxes). They ‘eat beef too … corned beef sandwiches and wears dhoti and reads the Upanishads in Sanskrit.”125

As a whole, we can say that “there are many ways of loving India, many things to love her for the scenery, the history, the poetry, the music, and indeed the physical beauty of men and women”126 but owing to cultural differences, the westerners put forth their allegation on us to ‘find out (their) weak spot’ and pressing on it.127 The skepticism of the Westerners would probably never end,

“It is very well to love and admire India – intellectually, aesthetically,… sexually…– but always with virile, measured, European feeling.”128

The above novelists have brought out all the specified cases and patches of cultural allotropy with the assertion that ‘India always changes people’ without ‘exception’.

And with pronouncement that ‘India is working towards a new age’.130 and ‘nowhere else (except India) could languages be mixed and spoken with such ease … American and Urdu…131 Indians are ready to hug anything western, beginning it from the names itself (denying the Shakespearean cry ‘what’s in a name’ and supporting the Oscar Wilde’s bunburryism) that is why, we love to be called “August” in stead of “Agastya’132, ‘Sandy’ for Zahira,133 ‘Sindi’ for Surrender Oberoi,134 and let Chidananda re-christened himself as ‘Chid’.135

To present and paint the prevailing cultural allotropy in such wider canvas, all credit goes to our Indian English writers. Much more research works have to be done in the near further that I shoulder on to the future budding researchers to look into the matter so deeply as it is oceanic to dive into.

I have all confidence that my thesis would help expatriates to understand India as far as their cross cultural training is concerned on their new postings in India. Along with the title of a feature news published in “Hindustan Times’, I would also end up my thesis pleading “Kindly Adjust, this is India”136

References :-

92. The Foreigner, p. 100

93. The Man-Eater of Malgudi, p. 34

94. The Foreigner, p. 115

95. The Man-Eater of Malgudi, pp. 7 – 8

96. The Foreigner, p. 43

97. ibid, p. 42

98. Heat andDust, p. 52

99. English August, p. 207

100. The Foreigner, p. 38

101. ibid, p. 175

102. Heat and Dust, p. 125

103. The man-Eater of Malgudi, p. 33

104. ibid, p. 42

105. ibid, p. 47

106. ‘English August’, p. 72 and ‘The Foreigner’, p. 104

107. The Coffer Dams, p. 70

108. The Man-Eater of Malgudi, p. 134

109. English August, p. 28

110. ibid, p. 110

111. ibid, p. 75

112. ibid, p. 71

113. ibid, p. 52

114. ibid, p. 81

115. ibid, p. 159

116. ibid, p. 153

117. ibid, p. 146

118. ibid, p. 117

119. ibid, pp. 59 – 60

120. The Foreigner, p. 70

121. ibid, p. 80

122. Heat and Dust, p. 22

123. ibid, p. 95

124. ibid, p. 21

125. English August, p. 281

126. Heat and Dust, p. 170

127. ibid, p. 170

128. ibid, p. 171

129. ibid, p. 2

130. The Foreigner, p. 38

131. English August, p. 1

132. The little of the novel itself i.e. English August.

133. Heat and Dust, p. 32

134. The Foreigner, p. 191

135. Heat and Dust, p. 24

136. Snehal Rebello, “Kindly Adjust this is India”, “Hindustan Times”, Monday, April 14, 2008.





Tuesday, January 25, 2011

CAS not enCASHed: Humble teachers, Fumble Adminstrationa

Question1: Should the matter of teachers’ promotional delay be brought in the periphery of Human Rights violations?


Ans (teachers): Yes.

Ans (varsity officials): No

Question2: Should teachers be penalized for the fault or lacunae in our system?

Ans (teacher):No

Ans (varsity officials): Yes

* ************



This is what exactly has been felt by many of the victimized teachers across the state who have been denied their due promotions under the CAS . Ranchi University has made it compulsory to attend at least one Orientation Course and one Refresher Course whereas, in the case of Ph.D. it is mandatory to attend one Orientation program of UGC run at different Academic Staff Colleges as per its Statute framed in the year 2007-08.But varsity officials did not think it necessary to attach a corrigendum in its statute in the light of fresh guidelines issued by UGC just in the next year, i.e., 2009.In its latest letter, i.e., Letter No. F.2-6/2002 (PS) dated 12th March, 2009, UGC clearly states, “ However, the date of participation in Orientation / refresher courses in respect of Teachers……for placement/ promotion under Career Advancement Scheme has been extended upto 30.6.2009.” In the same letter, it is also mentioned that , “ Whenever the requirement of participating in Orientation/ Refresher courses is not fulfilled, the promotion would not be held up…. Financial benefits should be given by the University from the due date of promotion.” Also, Ranchi University officials have shown their immaturity or impatience to draft a rule in the case of Ph.D. holders. Whereas, varsity officials have made it mandatory to attend one Orientation Program, UGC has never issued such guidelines. Instead, UGC in its letter No. F.2-9/97 (PS) very clearly writes, “A Ph.D. holder may be exempted for not having attended one course WHETHER refresher OR orientation courses as regards the eligibility for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme to Lecturer (Sr. Scale)”.

As a result of this blunder, the cases that have come on the surface are quite ludicrous:

Case 1: Teachers, who have cleared either their NET or have done their Ph.D. or both, have become juniors to those teachers who are neither Ph.D. nor NET qualified, just because they have attended a 4-week Orientation program!

Case2: Those whose due promotion date has been fixed in a later date i.e., with effect from the date of the completion of their Orientation Program, are finding themselves in “No-Man’s land” and are considered ineligible for Reader or Selection Grade promotion.



The real question is not of throwing the ball in one another’s court. The real question is whether these innocent teachers should be left penalized absolutely on their fate? Some officials ask the figure of such cases just to check out the magnitude of the problem. But, once again the answer that dawn on our conscience is what if the number is just one. Injustice done even to one is injustice done to the whole fraternity. But, in this Utilitarian society where figure is more important than the humanity, this is important to reveal that the number of such offended teachers is no less than a hundred. The relationship between discrepancies and Ranchi University is indestructible. The demoralized and humiliated teachers are confused how to save their lost honor. Whether they should go to the classrooms to “build up the nation” or move to the court for the redressal of their grievances? Teachers’ team has pleaded their case repeatedly before the higher authorities of the university but higher authorities are pre-occupied in many ‘other higher projects’. I remember one couplet:

Muh ki baat suney har koi/ dil ka dard janey kaun

Awajo ke bazaaro me/dil ka dard janey kaun

( Who cares to listen to the pain of yelling heart in this insensitive world/ who cares to listen to the marginalized voice in this world of show-biz market )










Friday, January 7, 2011

Semester System or Sinister System

Today I got an inspiration from one of my  nearest friend Nelly and I have been suggested that I should not stop writing. Actually I was not sure that my blog would get a sincere reader. But now I am. Assured that my friend is there to bear with my useless write-ups.. I would keep sending my posts..Also I would follow all her suggestions.....only  if I m really convinced from within..Thank you very much  and my all prospective readers ( know not where they are..!!!)But as the title of my blog goes..VIBRATIONS...certainly it would reach to many others .. but once again who cares if it do not..DUNIYA DI THAIIN2.....
Following is one of my article , designed and crafted for a Newspaper, hence the style is not at all of BLOG-IANS:


Semester System or Sinister system? _








The University Grants Commission(UGC) has instructed all central, state and deemed universities in India to adopt a semester and Choice Based Credit System (CBCS). The system will facilitate inter-institution transferability of students.

UGC Chairman Prof. Sukhdeo Thorat has written a letter (March, 2009) to all the vice-chancellors, informing them about the changes. The universities are now required to adopt the new measures regarding the introduction of semester system, credits for various courses and provision for inter-institution transferability of students. Varsities have been allotted a time period of two years to implement the measures. Now, the Ranchi University is also pulling up its shocks to implement it at PG and Under Graduate level (all autonomous colleges of the region have already implemented this).

The committee has also mentioned that all academic programs like certificate, diploma, undergraduate, postgraduate, MPhil and PhD courses, should be subject to up -gradation or revision to a limited extent every academic year and substantially every three years. The UGC argues, “not only will this endow the academic programs with quality, but also add to their contemporariness and importance”.

The UGC guidelines mention that the ongoing system of examination, conducted at the end of session, has lot of drawbacks and needs improvement. The semester system will encourage and support faster learning opportunities. Moreover, it has the ability to accommodate diverse choices that students may like to have.

But the inside story is quite different from the above. However, it requires the readers’ patience to hold a bit to dig out the real story.

In fact, till date we were supposed to follow the British system of education. The British Raj had left behind a university system in India, which was modeled after their system back home. The student was assessed at the end of each year, for the three-year undergraduate course, where he or she underwent a university-level examination at end of each year to assess the student’s comprehensive grasp of the subject, be it History, English, Chemistry, Biology or Physics. A similar pattern of examination was followed for the two-year post-graduate studies. All this is soon set to change. Needless to say, much against our desire.

So why have the policy makers thought that a semester-style, credit-system for higher education, which is typically an American system of education, makes more sense than the year-end comprehensive examination? That too, 60-62 years after the Independence!.( I wonder if this is not the case of American hegemony in the World economy and the world becoming the Uni-polar? )

After having a bit experience in some chosen few campuses of Ranchi University, the Semester System and related myths have got some fresh light and some shocking facts have come on the “dance-floor” which require immediate retrospection which can either save or alert the ‘potential victims’:

MYTH 1.“There is a very strong feeling among faculty members that the semester-system will make the students more focused and control absenteeism.”

FACT: It NEITHER makes them focused NOR control the absenteeism unless teachers and college administration are responsible enough to do so. Moreover, colleges with disproportionate ratio of teachers and students, such system hardly holds any credibility.

MYTH 2. “The Semester System is also more intensive, so the student has to keep up with what is being taught in class.”

FACT : Quite contrarily,it has marred the continuity of the subject as it remains no more comprehensive and once a semester is over, students tend to forget what they learnt the previous year. Also the internal marking system can be subjective and many eklavyas have all the possibilities to face the music of modern Dronacharyas..”.

MYTH 3. The advantage of the semester system over the end-of-the-year examination method is that it is rigorous. Assignments have to be completed within a stipulated time frame, which helps. In the end-of-the-year examination module, students tend to take their courses a little lightly.

FACT: As far as being its rigorous is concerned, true that, it is…!! interestingly, not for the students but for the teachers. Teachers have to finish the Herculean syllabus in time and then they have to set questions, go for the rigorous invigilation duty and then they have to rush for a marathon relay of evaluation works ( this new Year 2011 was historical for Marwari College, Ranchi as the teachers left their spouse yelling at home and they beat the chill keeping themselves warm by burning their grey cells while evaluating arid answer sheets …no better than shits!!) .

MYTH 4. “Students tend to be much more involved in a semester system and the relationship between the teacher and student is far more personal.”

FACT : Relationship of the teacher and student has nothing to do with the Semester System . Rather, it varies from person to person.

Some pro- Semester academicians describe the annual curriculum as a ‘thali’ and the semester system with a credit-based curriculum as a ‘cafeteria menu’. But , the people who have the experience of having ‘thali’ in dhabas know better its dietary value and its being economic .Undoubtedly, The Semester System increases the expenses of students and it sweeps away poor students to the “unprivileged” colleges.

The Inside Story :

Many of us do not have the ample guts to proclaim the truth that the King is nude. Teachers who try to raise his voice against such aped- system ( I would like to call it as ‘copy-paste’-system), they are labeled as regressive teachers. The inside story is that many of the “progressive” teachers are feeding students with the selected questions, syllabus has unofficially been shrinked to “Mallika Sherawat -limit”, real lecture mode teaching has been buried long back, short and written and “baazaru” notes are in vogue, spoon – feeding has become the compulsion and teachers have to struggle hard to be in good books of students as to save themselves from their ire in case of topic left untouched . As if it was not enough for us, the news that the teachers’ evaluation would be done on the basis of our ‘meritorious’ students’ feedback in the new system have caused an earthquake in the academic seismic zone. This is absolutely shameful. This enforcement of Semester System is just an eye-wash and it does not suit properly to the taste of Indian educational system as it has also been a conclusion drawn in a National Conference recently held in Bangalore.

The government is aiming to aggressively push the Gross Enrolment Ratio to 15% from the current 10% and the setting up of the 30 universities that will have the semester system in place is estimated to cost the government Rs 1,31,022 crore.

What is absolutely transparent that the education system in India is heading towards privatization .Unmindful promotion and packaging of Vocational courses, compelling colleges to go for autonomy and then screwing them for Semester System – all these moves are just to turn educational institutions into a profit-making agency. Change is good but a whirlpool of change at such an unpredictable speed, at times, comes up with cyclonic effect.

Before some more institutions are made victim of this new System, it is high time for the retrospection.

“Let us go then, you and I…mmmh...Eastward Ho!” – abrupt ending? Sorry, gentlemen, I am also a cog of this Semester system. I am used to leave my lectures midway.



.